Prosecutors seek inhibition of new judge handling De Lima’s last drug case | ABS-CBN
ADVERTISEMENT

Welcome, Kapamilya! We use cookies to improve your browsing experience. Continuing to use this site means you agree to our use of cookies. Tell me more!
Prosecutors seek inhibition of new judge handling De Lima’s last drug case
Prosecutors seek inhibition of new judge handling De Lima’s last drug case
Mike Navallo,
ABS-CBN News
Published Jul 06, 2023 11:22 AM PHT
|
Updated Jul 06, 2023 04:49 PM PHT

MANILA — After former Senator Leila de Lima’s co-accused secured the inhibition of a Muntinlupa judge who denied their bail plea, it’s now the prosecution’s turn to ask for the inhibition of the new handling judge, citing his prior decision acquitting the former lawmaker.
MANILA — After former Senator Leila de Lima’s co-accused secured the inhibition of a Muntinlupa judge who denied their bail plea, it’s now the prosecution’s turn to ask for the inhibition of the new handling judge, citing his prior decision acquitting the former lawmaker.
State prosecutors on Wednesday filed a motion for voluntary inhibition of Judge Abraham Joseph Alcantara, presiding judge of Muntinlupa Regional Trial Court Branch 204.
State prosecutors on Wednesday filed a motion for voluntary inhibition of Judge Abraham Joseph Alcantara, presiding judge of Muntinlupa Regional Trial Court Branch 204.
Alcantara, in May, acquitted De Lima and co-accused Ronnie Dayan of the conspiracy to commit illegal drug trading charge on the ground of reasonable doubt, after the main witness, former Bureau of Corrections OIC Rafael Ragos, recanted his allegations that he personally delivered P10 million in drug money to De Lima’s residence in Parañaque in 2012.
Alcantara, in May, acquitted De Lima and co-accused Ronnie Dayan of the conspiracy to commit illegal drug trading charge on the ground of reasonable doubt, after the main witness, former Bureau of Corrections OIC Rafael Ragos, recanted his allegations that he personally delivered P10 million in drug money to De Lima’s residence in Parañaque in 2012.
Prosecutors said this ruling casts doubt on Alcantara’s impartiality.
Prosecutors said this ruling casts doubt on Alcantara’s impartiality.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Having adversely decided against the People in the previous Criminal Case No. 17-165, the undersigned Panel of Prosecutors cannot help but be apprehensive that the Honorable Presiding Judge will carry over his perceptions to the instant case,” the motion said.
“Having adversely decided against the People in the previous Criminal Case No. 17-165, the undersigned Panel of Prosecutors cannot help but be apprehensive that the Honorable Presiding Judge will carry over his perceptions to the instant case,” the motion said.
“Thus, to erase any doubt as to the impartiality of the Honorable Presiding Judge as well as to remove any impression that he will similarly decide on the instant case in favor of the accused, the prosecution most respectfully moves that the Honorable Presiding Judge voluntarily inhibit himself from hearing the instant case,” it added.
“Thus, to erase any doubt as to the impartiality of the Honorable Presiding Judge as well as to remove any impression that he will similarly decide on the instant case in favor of the accused, the prosecution most respectfully moves that the Honorable Presiding Judge voluntarily inhibit himself from hearing the instant case,” it added.
The motion invoked decided Supreme Court cases which ruled that the “slightest doubt on the actions of a judge, whether well ground or not” can be the basis for voluntary inhibition.
The motion invoked decided Supreme Court cases which ruled that the “slightest doubt on the actions of a judge, whether well ground or not” can be the basis for voluntary inhibition.
It also cited Section 1, Rule 137 of the Rules of Court which states: “A judge may, in the exercise of his sound discretion, disqualify himself from sitting in a case, for just or valid reasons other than those mentioned above.”
It also cited Section 1, Rule 137 of the Rules of Court which states: “A judge may, in the exercise of his sound discretion, disqualify himself from sitting in a case, for just or valid reasons other than those mentioned above.”
REMULLA REACTION
Speaking at a press conference at the Department of Justice on Thursday, Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla distanced himself from the prosecution’s move to file a motion for inhibition.
Speaking at a press conference at the Department of Justice on Thursday, Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla distanced himself from the prosecution’s move to file a motion for inhibition.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Alam mo, as an institution, inabot na namin yan. We cannot direct them, one way or the other, kasi that direction was set already before. So it’s actually their own volition that they’re doing this as far as institutional continuity,” he said.
“Alam mo, as an institution, inabot na namin yan. We cannot direct them, one way or the other, kasi that direction was set already before. So it’s actually their own volition that they’re doing this as far as institutional continuity,” he said.
“Well, it can work, it may not work, but that’s how lawyers think. That’s how prosecution lawyers want to play their case. We just have to respect the process right now,” he added.
“Well, it can work, it may not work, but that’s how lawyers think. That’s how prosecution lawyers want to play their case. We just have to respect the process right now,” he added.
De Lima’s last drug case was raffled to Alcantara after the former handling judge, Romeo Buenaventura of Muntinlupa RTC Branch 256, inhibited from the case.
De Lima’s last drug case was raffled to Alcantara after the former handling judge, Romeo Buenaventura of Muntinlupa RTC Branch 256, inhibited from the case.
He had denied the former lawmaker’s bail petition on the ground that the evidence is strong.
He had denied the former lawmaker’s bail petition on the ground that the evidence is strong.
It was De Lima’s 3 co-accused, Dayan, Joenel Sanchez and former BuCor chief Franklin Bucayu who asked Buenaventura to inhibit from the case after learning that his brother had assisted Dayan in executing an affidavit prior to a House hearing in 2016, which Dayan later recanted.
It was De Lima’s 3 co-accused, Dayan, Joenel Sanchez and former BuCor chief Franklin Bucayu who asked Buenaventura to inhibit from the case after learning that his brother had assisted Dayan in executing an affidavit prior to a House hearing in 2016, which Dayan later recanted.
ADVERTISEMENT
Dayan had claimed the late Rep. Reynaldo Umali, then-chair of the House Committee on Justice, coerced him to testify against De Lima.
Dayan had claimed the late Rep. Reynaldo Umali, then-chair of the House Committee on Justice, coerced him to testify against De Lima.
It turned out Atty. Emmanuel Buenaventura, the judge’s brother, had acted as legal adviser to Umali.
It turned out Atty. Emmanuel Buenaventura, the judge’s brother, had acted as legal adviser to Umali.
Judge Buenaventura denied knowledge of his brother’s professional undertakings but recused from the case.
Judge Buenaventura denied knowledge of his brother’s professional undertakings but recused from the case.
Should Alcantara inhibit, the case will be re-raffled for a second time this year.
Should Alcantara inhibit, the case will be re-raffled for a second time this year.
De Lima has been detained since February 2017 on drug charges.
De Lima has been detained since February 2017 on drug charges.
ADVERTISEMENT
Two of the 3 drug charges have been dismissed.
Two of the 3 drug charges have been dismissed.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT