Lawmakers condemn 'tampering' of Maharlika bill after Congress approval | ABS-CBN

Welcome, Kapamilya! We use cookies to improve your browsing experience. Continuing to use this site means you agree to our use of cookies. Tell me more!
Lawmakers condemn 'tampering' of Maharlika bill after Congress approval
Lawmakers condemn 'tampering' of Maharlika bill after Congress approval
Jauhn Etienne Villaruel,
ABS-CBN News
Published Jun 22, 2023 02:51 PM PHT

MANILA — Lawmakers from both the Senate and House of Representatives on Thursday condemned the alleged "tampering" of the bill creating the Maharlika Investment Fund ahead of its transmittal to Malacañang for President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr.'s approval.
MANILA — Lawmakers from both the Senate and House of Representatives on Thursday condemned the alleged "tampering" of the bill creating the Maharlika Investment Fund ahead of its transmittal to Malacañang for President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr.'s approval.
“The enrolled bill being sent to the President is not the version properly and formally approved by Congress. Merong provision po diyan na ginalaw without plenary authority,” Pimentel said in a statement.
“The enrolled bill being sent to the President is not the version properly and formally approved by Congress. Merong provision po diyan na ginalaw without plenary authority,” Pimentel said in a statement.
(There was a provision that was changed without plenary authority.)
(There was a provision that was changed without plenary authority.)
Pimentel was questioning the "corrections" made by senators on the bill, which was finalized and signed on Wednesday by Senate President Juan Miguel Zubiri in Washington.
Pimentel was questioning the "corrections" made by senators on the bill, which was finalized and signed on Wednesday by Senate President Juan Miguel Zubiri in Washington.
ADVERTISEMENT
Pressed for specifics, Zubiri then told reporters he "believe[s] the corrections were thoroughly discussed by the majority bloc in our Viber group."
Pressed for specifics, Zubiri then told reporters he "believe[s] the corrections were thoroughly discussed by the majority bloc in our Viber group."
According to Pimentel, the move violated the Constitution.
According to Pimentel, the move violated the Constitution.
"The revisions made were not just matter of style. It showed a flagrant violation of our rules and the Constitution," Pimentel said.
"The revisions made were not just matter of style. It showed a flagrant violation of our rules and the Constitution," Pimentel said.
The Congress-approved version of Maharlika bill carried different prescription periods for the prosecution of crimes and offenses, with critics arguing that the error was substantive and had to be amended in the plenary.
The Congress-approved version of Maharlika bill carried different prescription periods for the prosecution of crimes and offenses, with critics arguing that the error was substantive and had to be amended in the plenary.
In a separate statement, Sen. Risa Hontiveros said she leaves it to constitutional lawyers to determine the legality of Maharlika bill's approval.
In a separate statement, Sen. Risa Hontiveros said she leaves it to constitutional lawyers to determine the legality of Maharlika bill's approval.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I leave it to the constitutional lawyers to determine whether there are constitutional issues... What this speaks volumes about is the inordinate rush to pass a bill just to acquiesce to the wishes of the Executive. Nagkandaugaga kaya tuloy andaming palpak," she said.
"I leave it to the constitutional lawyers to determine whether there are constitutional issues... What this speaks volumes about is the inordinate rush to pass a bill just to acquiesce to the wishes of the Executive. Nagkandaugaga kaya tuloy andaming palpak," she said.
(There were many errors because of the rush.)
(There were many errors because of the rush.)
Zubiri has yet to reply to reporters seeking his response to Pimentel's statement.
Zubiri has yet to reply to reporters seeking his response to Pimentel's statement.
On Wednesday, the Makabayan bloc issued a similar statement condemning the modification of the bill.
On Wednesday, the Makabayan bloc issued a similar statement condemning the modification of the bill.
"How can this be? Last time we checked, the Constitution does not allow legislation by Viber... This makes a mockery of the constitutional requirement of transparency when the legislature deliberates on and approves laws," the group said.
"How can this be? Last time we checked, the Constitution does not allow legislation by Viber... This makes a mockery of the constitutional requirement of transparency when the legislature deliberates on and approves laws," the group said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Pimentel said Marcos should veto the bill to "prevent a national embarrassment."
Pimentel said Marcos should veto the bill to "prevent a national embarrassment."
Marcos earlier in the day said he would sign the bill "soon" after it gets to his office.
Marcos earlier in the day said he would sign the bill "soon" after it gets to his office.
Read More:
Senate
Maharlika
Maharlika fund
Migz Zubiri
Zubiri
Mark Villar
bicam
Koko Pimentel
Risa Hontiveros
Makabayan
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT