Supreme Court dismisses Marcos ill-gotten wealth case | ABS-CBN
ADVERTISEMENT
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d998c/d998c1524ae866bbfc56e1b62cdd0cb7fd561a9f" alt="dpo-dps-seal"
Welcome, Kapamilya! We use cookies to improve your browsing experience. Continuing to use this site means you agree to our use of cookies. Tell me more!
Supreme Court dismisses Marcos ill-gotten wealth case
Supreme Court dismisses Marcos ill-gotten wealth case
Adrian Ayalin,
ABS-CBN News
Published Nov 14, 2023 04:28 PM PHT
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77780/77780a076c8489ad4c0d176e4c6b7cc1eb0d0eea" alt="Clipboard"
MANILA — The Supreme Court has affirmed the Sandiganbayan's dismissal of the complaint filed by the Republic of the Philippines for the recovery of supposed P41 billion in ill-gotten wealth of the Marcoses involving business tycoon Lucio Tan.
MANILA — The Supreme Court has affirmed the Sandiganbayan's dismissal of the complaint filed by the Republic of the Philippines for the recovery of supposed P41 billion in ill-gotten wealth of the Marcoses involving business tycoon Lucio Tan.
In a decision dated October 3, 2023, the court en banc denied the petition for review on certiorari filed by the Republic for lack of merit.
In a decision dated October 3, 2023, the court en banc denied the petition for review on certiorari filed by the Republic for lack of merit.
The complaint filed before the Sandiganbayan in 1987, docketed as Civil Case No. 005, involves shares of stocks valued at P41.058 billion, as estimated by the Presidential Commission on Good Government in 2020.
The complaint filed before the Sandiganbayan in 1987, docketed as Civil Case No. 005, involves shares of stocks valued at P41.058 billion, as estimated by the Presidential Commission on Good Government in 2020.
Aside from former President Ferdinand Marcos, Sr. and his wife Imelda, the respondents in the complaint included their son President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., and daughters Sen. Imee Marcos and Irene Araneta, among others.
Aside from former President Ferdinand Marcos, Sr. and his wife Imelda, the respondents in the complaint included their son President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., and daughters Sen. Imee Marcos and Irene Araneta, among others.
ADVERTISEMENT
In the decision of the Sandiganbayan dated June 11, 2012, the court dismissed the complaint for the failure of the Republic to prove that the assets and properties were ill-gotten wealth because it was not shown that they originated from the government’s resources.
In the decision of the Sandiganbayan dated June 11, 2012, the court dismissed the complaint for the failure of the Republic to prove that the assets and properties were ill-gotten wealth because it was not shown that they originated from the government’s resources.
The Supreme Court decision noted that the testimony of Marcos Jr. on August 21, 2007 and February 13, 2018 — which the Republic used to prove its allegations of ill-gotten wealth by Marcos Sr. in relation to Tan —was hearsay.
The Supreme Court decision noted that the testimony of Marcos Jr. on August 21, 2007 and February 13, 2018 — which the Republic used to prove its allegations of ill-gotten wealth by Marcos Sr. in relation to Tan —was hearsay.
The salient portion of the testimony of Marcos Jr. related to the supposed meetings with his father and the tycoon regarding the alleged interest of the Marcoses in Tan's businesses.
The salient portion of the testimony of Marcos Jr. related to the supposed meetings with his father and the tycoon regarding the alleged interest of the Marcoses in Tan's businesses.
The court, however, stressed that Marcos Jr. did not have personal knowledge of the alleged 60-40 business arrangement or share transfers between and among various corporations involved in the case.
The court, however, stressed that Marcos Jr. did not have personal knowledge of the alleged 60-40 business arrangement or share transfers between and among various corporations involved in the case.
“Thus the court finds that Marcos, Jr.’s testimony is hearsay and may not be used to prove the truth of the facts asserted,” the Supreme Court said in the en banc decision penned by Associate Justice Rodil Zalameda.
“Thus the court finds that Marcos, Jr.’s testimony is hearsay and may not be used to prove the truth of the facts asserted,” the Supreme Court said in the en banc decision penned by Associate Justice Rodil Zalameda.
The affidavit of Rolando Gapud, the supposed financial executor of Marcos Sr. and Imelda, was also dismissed as hearsay.
The affidavit of Rolando Gapud, the supposed financial executor of Marcos Sr. and Imelda, was also dismissed as hearsay.
While the Republic insisted that Gapud’s affidavit was personally taken by former PCGG Chairman Jovito Salonga, his statement is not admissible for being hearsay.
While the Republic insisted that Gapud’s affidavit was personally taken by former PCGG Chairman Jovito Salonga, his statement is not admissible for being hearsay.
“Gapud’s affidavit remains devoid of probative value for purposes of establishing the truth of Gapud’s claims on the alleged 60-40 business arrangement between Marcos and respondent Tan,” the court said.
“Gapud’s affidavit remains devoid of probative value for purposes of establishing the truth of Gapud’s claims on the alleged 60-40 business arrangement between Marcos and respondent Tan,” the court said.
The Supreme Court also noted that most of the documentary evidence relating to companies such as Fortune Tobacco, Allied Bank and other holding companies were merely copies of private documents.
The Supreme Court also noted that most of the documentary evidence relating to companies such as Fortune Tobacco, Allied Bank and other holding companies were merely copies of private documents.
“That most of the documents were in the custody of the PCGG does not make them public in character,” the Supreme Court said.
“That most of the documents were in the custody of the PCGG does not make them public in character,” the Supreme Court said.
ADVERTISEMENT
PCG outlines 'plausible' reasons for China aggression at sea
PCG outlines 'plausible' reasons for China aggression at sea
Rowegie Abanto,
ABS-CBN News
Published Feb 20, 2025 10:41 AM PHT
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77780/77780a076c8489ad4c0d176e4c6b7cc1eb0d0eea" alt="Clipboard"
Watch more on iWantTFC.com. Watch hundreds of Pinoy shows, movies, live sports and news.
Watch more on iWantTFC.com. Watch hundreds of Pinoy shows, movies, live sports and news.
MANILA — As a Philippine aircraft conducted maritime domain awareness over Bajo de Masinloc, also known as Scarborough Shoal, in the West Philippine Sea on Tuesday, a People's Liberation Army Navy helicopter tailed it and executed "dangerous" maneuvers, potentially endangering its passengers, including journalists.
MANILA — As a Philippine aircraft conducted maritime domain awareness over Bajo de Masinloc, also known as Scarborough Shoal, in the West Philippine Sea on Tuesday, a People's Liberation Army Navy helicopter tailed it and executed "dangerous" maneuvers, potentially endangering its passengers, including journalists.
This is the latest act of Beijing's aggression in the South China Sea, which it claims almost entirely, including parts of the West Philippine Sea.
This is the latest act of Beijing's aggression in the South China Sea, which it claims almost entirely, including parts of the West Philippine Sea.
Commodore Jay Tarriela, Philippine Coast Guard spokesperson for the West Philippine Sea concerns, told ANC on Thursday that China could have several "plausible" reasons for elevating its calculated aggression in the South China Sea.
Commodore Jay Tarriela, Philippine Coast Guard spokesperson for the West Philippine Sea concerns, told ANC on Thursday that China could have several "plausible" reasons for elevating its calculated aggression in the South China Sea.
Tarriela said Chinese President Xi Jinping could be trying to challenge the believers of the rules-based order, especially countries that support Manila's condemnation of Beijing's "illegal" actions.
Tarriela said Chinese President Xi Jinping could be trying to challenge the believers of the rules-based order, especially countries that support Manila's condemnation of Beijing's "illegal" actions.
ADVERTISEMENT
He added that Xi may "not want to be seen by his own people that he is backing down" on China's claims in the South China Sea.
He added that Xi may "not want to be seen by his own people that he is backing down" on China's claims in the South China Sea.
The Chinese leader, Tarriela also said, likely does not want other Southeast Asian countries to come up with a transparency effort similar to the Philippines "because the moment they started doing that it would be much more difficult for President Xi Jinping to counter their exposure of aggressive action in the South China Sea."
The Chinese leader, Tarriela also said, likely does not want other Southeast Asian countries to come up with a transparency effort similar to the Philippines "because the moment they started doing that it would be much more difficult for President Xi Jinping to counter their exposure of aggressive action in the South China Sea."
Tarriela surmised that Xi wanted the Philippine government to stop exposing its hostility.
Tarriela surmised that Xi wanted the Philippine government to stop exposing its hostility.
But the West Philippine Sea task force believes that publicizing China's aggression is still the right thing to do, he said, not just for Filipinos but also for the world.
But the West Philippine Sea task force believes that publicizing China's aggression is still the right thing to do, he said, not just for Filipinos but also for the world.
He vowed that the PCG would not be deterred from carrying out legitimate patrols to assert the country's sovereign rights in the West Philippine Sea.
He vowed that the PCG would not be deterred from carrying out legitimate patrols to assert the country's sovereign rights in the West Philippine Sea.
RELATED VIDEO:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT