The ‘Patrollers’ - Carissa Manuel-Pancho


by Carissa Manuel–Pancho, ABS-CBN News Desk Editor | 10/29/2009 12:05 AM

Having handled Boto Mo iPatrol Mo! (BMPM) during the 2007 elections, I have seen it evolve into what it is today. It is enriching to realize that our voters are becoming more vigilant this time around.

In 2007, vote-buying complaints poured in toward the latter part of the race. But surprisingly, this time, our ‘Boto Patrollers’ are full of conviction in reporting election anomalies early on.

Tips vary from money being wrapped in candy packs completely sealed and concealed as sweet treats, to money bills being inserted in inflated balloons and given out to children after Sunday Masses every morning.

Amazing how the Filipino ingenuity works, using children as decoy!

If distribution of barangay grocery bags has become a thing of the past, now it has morphed into very expensive trips taken by barangay captains abroad courtesy of Mr. Candidate.

When we aired this BMPM story on TV Patrol World, tipsters started to pour in from different parts of the country, informing us that their barangay officials had left the country as well, and had spent millions from the mayor’s budget.

Vote buying still top concern

It just saddens me that, despite these complaints, nothing has improved in terms of vote-buying tactics.

It is, however, still the number one concern of viewers.

Last election, I got a call from a concerned citizen informing us that they were forced to stay in a resort just so they wouldn’t be able to vote on the day of the election.

And now, with automation underway, our ‘Patrollers’ are wary of the very vulnerable sector of society which will be bought again in a more “high-tech” way, so to speak.

Automation: How to vote

With barely 6 months away from the campaign season, what the voters are more concerned about is how to vote using the automated machines.

They fear that cheating will occur by transferring their names in different precincts so that there would be confusion come election day.

Believe it or not, I have read i-report text complaints wherein mayoralty candidates, councilors, etc. in far flung provinces are worried since they are clueless on how to go about the automated polls.

If the candidates are clueless, what more the voters?

A young viewer innocently admitted that since it is automated, he figured he will be casting his vote in front of a computer!

Another voter apprehension is taking advantage of the less fortunate who are semi-literate when it comes to casting their votes.

They feel that people will be taking advantage of them in the polling places.

Complaints like these are what I have to sift through in a daily basis. They generally reflect the citizenry’s preparedness--or lack of it--for the first national computerized elections. They give a glimpse on how our teachers will have to educate every voter for the May 10 polls.

Wiser voters

But generally, I believe the Filipino voter has matured and are wise voters for that matter.

I was shocked when I read an e-mail sent to BMPM, wherein this first-time voter boldly revealed that he will take any money given to him by a candidate, but will NOT vote for that person!

And amazingly, this young voter is not alone. I have received text and BMPM Blogs saying the same thing! Ironically, as early as now, there are candidates who are gathering small groups of individuals (eg: tricycle associations, senior citizens groups, etc.) wherein money is given out in these meetings.

Are we really a country where money dictates our vote? Has our dignity reached that low? Do the voters rejoice in the sheer outpouring of money that is given to them during the election season? Do they prefer to elect officials who do not perform and engage in money-making businesses like jueteng, quarrying and other illegal activities once elected?

Is this what we want the next generation to inherit? I don’t think so!

The responses I get from first-time voters are full of hope.

BMPM’s “Ako ang Simula” campaign has empowered them.

They have a voice, and in their own little way, THEY BELIEVE THEY CAN MAKE A DIFFRENCE.  

as of 10/29/2009 12:08 AM

Financial Collapse

Please post this because there is a danger. This can affect us all if the dollar will collapse.

Saudis drop WTI oil contract
By Javier Blas in London
Published: October 28 2009 20:27 | Last updated: October 28 2009 20:27
Saudi Arabia on Wednesday decided to drop the widely used West Texas Intermediate oil contract as the benchmark for pricing its oil, dealing a serious blow to the New York Mercantile Exchange.
The decision by the world’s biggest oil exporter could encourage other producers to abandon the benchmark and threatens the dominance of the world’s most heavily traded oil futures contract. It is the main contract traded on Nymex.
EDITOR’S CHOICE
Q&A: Have oil prices broken free? - Oct-28
FT Trading Room - Jul-30
Conoco details plans to sell assets - Oct-28
Energy source blog - Jul-15
In depth: Oil - Sep-02
Corporate earnings diary - Oct-08
The move reveals the growing discontent of Riyadh and its US refinery customers with WTI after the price of the price of the benchmark became separatedfrom the global oil market this year.
The surge in oil inventories in Cushing, Oklahoma, where WTI is delivered into America’s pipeline system, depressed the value of the WTI against other global benchmarks, throwing the global oil market into disarray.
In January, WTI, which usually trades at a premium of $1-$2 a barrel to Brent, fell sharply, leaving it at a discount of almost $12 – a record gap. This dislocation in the market continued well into the summer.
From January, Saudi Arabia will base the price of oil for its US customers on a new index developed by Argus, the London-based oil pricing company.
The Argus Sour Crude Index will track the price in the physical market of a basket of US Gulf Coast crudes, including Mars, Poseidon and Southern Green Canyon.
Argus said the change in policy reflected the “increased importance of the US Gulf coast sour crude market, in which both production and trading activity was rising sharply”.
Paul Horsnell, head of commodities research at Barclays Capital in London, said Saudi Arabia’s decision was likely to reflect a “wider discontent” from its customers in the US about WTI performance.
ExxonMobil, Marathon and Valero are among the US’s biggest buyers of Saudi crude oil.
Edward Morse, chief economist at LCM Commodities in New York, said: “It is a recognition by large players that WTI sometimes does not reflect the true value of crude oil in the waterborne market.”
Saudi Arabia has priced its oil using WTI since 1994.
The price was based on quotes from the physical market which were compiled by Platt’s, a unit of McGraw-Hill.
Oil companies then covered their exposure to WTI using the futures market on Nymex.
Bob Levin, managing director of market research at the CME Group-owned Nymex, said the exchange was ready to move with the market.
“We plan to introduce a cash-settled futures contract tracking the new Argus index,” he said.
Mike Vinciquerra, equity research analyst at BMO Capital Markets, said the new Argus index would not replace WTI. “It’s more a supplement,” he said.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.

Collapse of the Greenback?
Will the Dollar get an “Arab Oil Shock”?
http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/1973_Oil_Shock/Greenback_Collapse/...
Ever since Washington tore up the Bretton Woods treaty in August 1971 and went onto a “dollar paper reserve system” instead of a dollar backed by gold, the United States, as the world’s most powerful military power, has been able to dictate financial terms to the world. Nations like Japan and later China, dependent on US export markets, would dutifully invest their trade surplus dollars into US Government debt, in effect financing wars such as Iraq or Afghanistan they opposed. They saw no choice. Arab oil producing countries, under US military pressure, were forced to sell oil only in dollars, a direct prop to the dollar when the US economy was in terminal decline. That may be rapidly about to come to an end.
According to a leaked report from Arab Gulf oil producers, there have been a series of secret meetings in recent months between the major Arab oil producers, including Saudi Arabia, and reportedly also Russia, together with the leading oil consumer countries including two of the three largest oil import countries¯China and Japan.
Their project is to quietly create the basis to end a 65-year long “iron rule” of selling oil only in US dollars. As I document in my book, Century of War, following the 400% oil price shock of 1973, which was deliberately blamed by US media on “greedy Arab Sheikhs,” the US Treasury made a secret trip to Riyadh to tell the Saudis in blunt terms that if they wanted US military defense against potential Israeli attack, that OPEC must privately agree never to sell oil in currencies other than the US dollar. That “petrodollar” system allowed the US to run staggering trade deficits and remain the world reserve currency, the heart of its ability to dominate and control world financial markets until the crisis of the sub-prime real estate securitization in August 2007.
The participants in the project reportedly envision using a basket of currencies reflecting producer-consumer trade relations, one backed by gold as a solid backbone. It would not initially be a new currency as some have surmised, but rather an arrangement that would eliminate the risks of pricing oil sales in fluctuating and likely depreciating dollars.
Iran announced recently that in the future it would sell its oil for euros not dollars. According to these reports, the basket of currencies would include a mix of yen, euros, Chinese yuan, gold. Brazil would reportedly join as both a producer and consumer country.
The secret plan was first reported by respected Middle East correspondent, Robert Fisk, in the UK Independent. Fisk claims to have confirmed existence of the plan from Arab as well as Hong Kong Chinese sources. I have confirmed from very senior and well-informed Gulf sources that the talks are in fact real. The oil producing countries have been fed up for years about having to price their oil in dollars or face US reprisals. They are steadily losing as the dollar depreciates against other currencies and against gold. Following the US declaration of the War on Terror by the Bush Administration after September 11, 2001 most leading Arab oil producing countries privately saw US policy as being aggressively aimed at them. The unjustifiable US invasion and occupation of Iraq in 2003 merely confirmed that as well as subsequent US threats against Iran.
Initially various governments involved in the leaked plan have publicly denied vehemently such a plan. That in no way invalidates that such moves are afoot. They are well aware that the United States as a wounded tiger can be far more dangerous. The leak of the plans in the world media, whether every detail reported by Fisk is true or not, feeds what is an inevitable decline in the dollar as a reliable reserve currency for world commerce.
What is not clear is what the potential response of Germany and France, the two pivot powers within the EU will be. If they decide to cast their lot with oil producing and consuming countries, they open their doors to vast new trade and investment potentials from the countries of Eurasia. If they cringe from that and decide to remain with the British Pound and US dollar, they will inevitably sink along as the dollar Titanic sinks.
With that decline of the US dollar goes the lessening of the political power of the United States as sole economic and financial superpower. We face very turbulent waters ahead and gold not surprisingly is gaining in this uncertainty.

Video


More Videos