RE: Lito Atienza's credibility after Lozada kidnapping

By Johnty, reader

Posted at May 24 2010 04:14 PM | Updated as of May 25 2010 12:14 AM

Atienza claims to have witnesses to prove that several people took over the EDP section of Manila City hall to fabricate spurious election returns. Why did he not mention the time and date of this occurrence as is with his claim of being cheated due to irregular time and date inputs on ER’s? 
 
Why did his witness not give the name of her superior that asked them to step out of their offices while the covert operation was done? Where the operators totally alien to her? If so then she should have not allowed total strangers to use City Hall facilities specially the EDP which is so critical to city hall operations and called for security plus reported it immediately to the office of the mayor for proper documentation.
 
More suspicious is the stupidity of alleged highly trained professional IT personnel to commit a crime within the City Hall and leave damming incriminating evidence scattered around the crime scene for anyone and everyone to see. Does this make sense at all?
 
Atienza’s claims are as ridiculous as his statements on the Jun Lozada kidnapping and should be taken with a grain of salt for the man’s credibility is definitely questionable.
 
Johnty
johnty[at]boxbe.com